Discussion:
[TuxOnIce-devel] TuxOnIce for Linux 3.17?
Matthias Hensler
2014-11-11 10:33:48 UTC
Permalink
Hi there,

any chance of seeing support for Kernel 3.17 soon? I noticed that the
latest commit on the current gittree on github was nearly 3 months ago.

I tried to merge the recent 3.16-version to Linux 3.17 myself, but there
were some lowlevel changes which I am not qualified to resolve :)

Is there anyone who made some progress here or any chance to bribe
Nigel with some chocolate to do it himself? :)


Regards,
Matthias
Oleksandr Natalenko
2014-11-11 10:37:07 UTC
Permalink
I've semi-ported TOI onto 3.17 kernel for pf-kernel but had to revert series
of upstream patches to do that. Also, still have to investigate building TOI
as modules.
Post by Matthias Hensler
Hi there,
any chance of seeing support for Kernel 3.17 soon? I noticed that the
latest commit on the current gittree on github was nearly 3 months ago.
I tried to merge the recent 3.16-version to Linux 3.17 myself, but there
were some lowlevel changes which I am not qualified to resolve :)
Is there anyone who made some progress here or any chance to bribe
Nigel with some chocolate to do it himself? :)
Regards,
Matthias
--
Oleksandr post-factum Natalenko, MSc
pf-kernel community
https://natalenko.name/
Nigel Cunningham
2014-11-12 12:01:49 UTC
Permalink
I've done the update for the upstream changes; I just haven't gotten the
opportunity to test and debug yet.

I'll happily accept chocolate.

Regards,

Nigel
Post by Oleksandr Natalenko
I've semi-ported TOI onto 3.17 kernel for pf-kernel but had to revert series
of upstream patches to do that. Also, still have to investigate building TOI
as modules.
Post by Matthias Hensler
Hi there,
any chance of seeing support for Kernel 3.17 soon? I noticed that the
latest commit on the current gittree on github was nearly 3 months ago.
I tried to merge the recent 3.16-version to Linux 3.17 myself, but there
were some lowlevel changes which I am not qualified to resolve :)
Is there anyone who made some progress here or any chance to bribe
Nigel with some chocolate to do it himself? :)
Regards,
Matthias
Oleksandr Natalenko
2014-11-13 11:08:59 UTC
Permalink
Any chances to help you in testing that? Should I send you chocolate via EMS?
Post by Nigel Cunningham
I've done the update for the upstream changes; I just haven't gotten the
opportunity to test and debug yet.
I'll happily accept chocolate.
Regards,
Nigel
Post by Oleksandr Natalenko
I've semi-ported TOI onto 3.17 kernel for pf-kernel but had to revert
series of upstream patches to do that. Also, still have to investigate
building TOI as modules.
Post by Matthias Hensler
Hi there,
any chance of seeing support for Kernel 3.17 soon? I noticed that the
latest commit on the current gittree on github was nearly 3 months ago.
I tried to merge the recent 3.16-version to Linux 3.17 myself, but there
were some lowlevel changes which I am not qualified to resolve :)
Is there anyone who made some progress here or any chance to bribe
Nigel with some chocolate to do it himself? :)
Regards,
Matthias
--
Oleksandr post-factum Natalenko, MSc
pf-kernel community
https://natalenko.name/
Nigel Cunningham
2014-11-16 21:40:17 UTC
Permalink
Hehe.

I'll try to find some time to test it this week. I don't want to give it
to anyone else yet, lest it damage your on-disk data or such like.

Nigel
Post by Oleksandr Natalenko
Any chances to help you in testing that? Should I send you chocolate via EMS?
Post by Nigel Cunningham
I've done the update for the upstream changes; I just haven't gotten the
opportunity to test and debug yet.
I'll happily accept chocolate.
Regards,
Nigel
Post by Oleksandr Natalenko
I've semi-ported TOI onto 3.17 kernel for pf-kernel but had to revert
series of upstream patches to do that. Also, still have to investigate
building TOI as modules.
Post by Matthias Hensler
Hi there,
any chance of seeing support for Kernel 3.17 soon? I noticed that the
latest commit on the current gittree on github was nearly 3 months ago.
I tried to merge the recent 3.16-version to Linux 3.17 myself, but there
were some lowlevel changes which I am not qualified to resolve :)
Is there anyone who made some progress here or any chance to bribe
Nigel with some chocolate to do it himself? :)
Regards,
Matthias
Loading...